Marketing & search · Practice guide

Use consistent campaign names in reports

Illustrative situation

The same campaign appears under three names because links were tagged differently. Paid and organic traffic are mixed in a spreadsheet summary. Inconsistent campaign labels split the same activity across several rows and make comparisons harder. A manageable naming convention gives the team a shared language for future links, while historic differences need an explicit mapping.

Healthcare marketing calendar, campaign materials and a laptop showing anonymous charts.
Help the right people find your service and take a useful next step.

What this means for your practice

Maintain a controlled campaign naming convention and map historical inconsistencies explicitly. Preserve an unclassified bucket instead of silently guessing every source.

An example to discuss with your team

Submit sample tracking values with spelling differences and missing fields to the reporting model. Confirm the resulting labels and unclassified cases are explainable.

Healthcare marketing planning with an editorial calendar, audience question and campaign brief.
Start with the audience question and a clear content brief.
Healthcare marketing enquiry journey connecting a service page, message and appointment calendar.
Connect the public promise to a supported next step.

What to discuss with your agency

Ask the agency to process sample labels with spelling variants and missing fields. Known differences should be grouped through a documented rule; unknown sources should remain unknown. Assign someone to maintain the naming list when services or campaigns change so the report does not drift again.

Put the brief into practice

Create a short naming guide for future campaign links, with examples the people preparing campaigns can follow. Keep the list manageable and assign someone to maintain it when services or channels change. For historic inconsistencies, record known mappings explicitly rather than rewriting every unknown value into the most likely category. Ask the agency to show the original value and the reporting label for a sample so the grouping remains explainable. Include spelling differences, renamed campaigns and missing information in the review.

Decide how unclassified entries appear in the report and who investigates patterns worth correcting. A naming guide should support cleaner collection at the source, not require the analyst to repair the same errors every month. When comparing periods, explain any material change in classification that moves records between channels. Otherwise a tidy new naming scheme can create apparent performance changes that actually come from how the data was grouped.

How to check the result

Measure the proportion of recorded enquiries with a usable and consistent channel classification.

Turn reading into a next step

Your action checklist

Work through these checks with your team or supplier. Tick the ones you have resolved and leave unknowns open.

Checks to discuss

Record what you know, what is still missing and the answer you need from your team or supplier.

Use project decisions only, without personal, patient or confidential details. Entries stay in this page and are not submitted to Kay & Co. Copy or download before leaving; this page does not save your notes.

Further reading

These sources provide background for the topic. The practice examples and checklist are illustrative planning suggestions from Kay & Co.

Related guides

Need help with this?

Tell us what is getting in the way. Kay & Co. can help you understand the options and turn the next step into something that works for your practice.

Explore marketing & search services or discuss your project.

Try the free Healthcare Digital Planner to find your starting priority.