Marketing & search · Practical guide

Use consistent campaign names that staff can reproduce

Different staff use inconsistent capitalisation and separators for the same campaign labels.

Healthcare marketing calendar, campaign materials and a laptop showing anonymous charts.
Help the right people find your service and take a useful next step.

What to change

Adopt a controlled naming convention based on the reporting decision, then confirm which existing variants actually mean the same thing. Similar text can still describe different campaigns, so do not merge purely by appearance. Provide an approved example that staff can copy when building new links, and test the complete landing URL. Keep any historical grouping transparent so a cleaner report does not disguise an unexplained change in classification.

A worked example

Illustrative example

Fictional naming example: agree source = practice_newsletter, medium = email and campaign = autumn_opening_2026_10 for one October send. Two staff preparing that same send should produce those exact values. A genuinely different November send uses its own approved campaign value rather than being silently grouped into October. Keep the destination page identical when comparing their drafts, then open both completed links. Review older spelling variants with the campaign owner before mapping them together. These are sample labels, not a mandatory naming scheme or a claim about a live campaign.

Healthcare marketing planning with an editorial calendar, audience question and campaign brief.
Start with the audience question and a clear content brief.
Healthcare marketing enquiry journey connecting a service page, message and appointment calendar.
Connect the public promise to a supported next step.

What this means for your practice

Small differences in capital letters, spaces or separators can split one initiative across several report rows. Begin by confirming which existing labels genuinely refer to the same activity. Similar wording is not enough to merge separate campaigns. Agree a simple naming example that staff can copy, then ask two people to create draft links from the same brief. They should produce consistent labels and the intended landing page. Keep any historical grouping transparent so a cleaner chart does not disguise changed definitions. The purpose is a reporting distinction the practice can use, rather than a complicated naming system that requires a specialist for every new link.

How to check the result

Future labels are consistent and any historical grouping has an explained mapping.

A mistake to avoid

Automatic lowercasing cannot resolve labels that represent different business activities.

Turn reading into a next step

Your action checklist

Work through these checks with your team or supplier. Tick the ones you have resolved and leave unknowns open.

Checks to discuss

Record what you know, what is still missing and the answer you need from your team or supplier.

Use project decisions only, without personal, patient or confidential details. Entries stay in this page and are not submitted to Kay & Co. Copy or download before leaving; this page does not save your notes.

Further reading

These sources provide background for the topic. The practice examples and checklist are illustrative planning suggestions from Kay & Co.

Related guides

Need help with this?

Tell us what is getting in the way. Kay & Co. can help you understand the options and turn the next step into something that works for your practice.

Explore marketing & search services or discuss your project.

Try the free Healthcare Digital Planner to find your starting priority.