Websites & patient experience · Practical guide

Respond helpfully when a patient finds conflicting instructions

A patient says their confirmation and the website give different arrival or preparation information. Staff may know which one is right, but the content still leaves the next visitor exposed to confusion. When a patient points out conflicting instructions, treat their report as a clue to the whole journey. Ask which page or message they used, then compare it with the information reception currently gives.

Healthcare website and appointment calendar displayed on devices at an empty clinic reception.
Make the website useful for the people who use your practice.

What to change

Treat the report as evidence of a specific contradiction to verify. Resolve the practical fact with its responsible owner before deciding which page or message should change.

A worked example

Illustrative example

A confirmation names one reception point while the website names another. The local team verifies the current route, and both the message template and location copy are aligned.

Healthcare website design showing connected desktop and mobile service and enquiry layouts.
Make the service and next step clear on every screen.
Healthcare website accessibility illustrated by a focus outline, keyboard key, contrast samples and form.
Review keyboard access, contrast and understandable form fields.

Put it into practice

Correct the source and any copies, rather than only answering the individual complaint. A brief, clear acknowledgement can explain which instruction now applies without making the patient responsible for diagnosing your publishing process.

Keep a record of the corrected source so colleagues can answer the next similar question consistently. The patient-facing reply can remain brief while the internal correction is properly completed.

What to agree before publishing

Ask the patient which page or message created the confusion, then settle the current instruction with the responsible team. The individual reply should identify what applies to their question without making them investigate the website. Separately, correct the source and its active copies. Include reception in that correction so the next caller hears the same explanation. A useful response acknowledges the practical problem and repairs the information trail, rather than treating the report as an isolated misunderstanding.

How to check the result

The contradiction has a documented resolution and the patient-facing route no longer gives incompatible instructions.

A mistake to avoid

Do not assume the newest-looking item is correct or ask the patient to decide which source the practice should trust.

Turn reading into a next step

Your action checklist

Work through these checks with your team or supplier. Tick the ones you have resolved and leave unknowns open.

Checks to discuss

Record what you know, what is still missing and the answer you need from your team or supplier.

Use project decisions only, without personal, patient or confidential details. Entries stay in this page and are not submitted to Kay & Co. Copy or download before leaving; this page does not save your notes.

Further reading

These sources provide background for the topic. The practice examples and checklist are illustrative planning suggestions from Kay & Co.

Related guides

Need help with this?

Tell us what is getting in the way. Kay & Co. can help you understand the options and turn the next step into something that works for your practice.

Explore websites & patient experience services or discuss your project.

Try the free Healthcare Digital Planner to find your starting priority.