Marketing & search · Practical guide

Explain why two dashboards can credit different sources

One report describes a visitor's first acquisition while another describes the current session or event credit.

Healthcare marketing calendar, campaign materials and a laptop showing anonymous charts.
Help the right people find your service and take a useful next step.

What to change

Compare the exact dimensions before reconciling totals. Similar source labels can answer different questions about the same multi-visit journey. Ask each report owner to state the scope and relevant attribution settings, then demonstrate them with a fictional repeat visitor. If the questions differ, present the measures separately with clear names. Forcing agreement by altering filters can remove useful distinctions and still leave the underlying definitions inconsistent.

A worked example

Illustrative example

Illustrative test: The analyst explains why the journey receives different labels in the two views. Preserve both report definitions in the handover so later analysts can reproduce the explanation. A fictional person first arrives through an email and returns later through search before submitting an enquiry. Two dashboards may legitimately credit different parts of that journey because one describes first acquisition and another a later visit or action. The analyst names those questions and demonstrates their settings. The practice keeps both useful views with clear labels instead of changing filters until two fundamentally different measures happen to agree.

Healthcare marketing planning with an editorial calendar, audience question and campaign brief.
Start with the audience question and a clear content brief.
Healthcare marketing enquiry journey connecting a service page, message and appointment calendar.
Connect the public promise to a supported next step.

What this means for your practice

Two reports can use the word Source while answering different questions. One may describe how a person first arrived; another may describe the current visit or credit for a particular action. Ask each report owner to state the exact question and settings behind the measure. Then use a fictional person arriving through two channels on separate visits to demonstrate the difference. If both reports are useful, keep them with clear names rather than changing filters until their totals happen to match. The practice should be able to explain why the labels differ and which view supports the decision at hand. Matching column headings alone do not establish matching definitions.

How to check the result

Each dashboard has a clear question and justified interpretation.

A mistake to avoid

Matching column headings do not establish equivalent measurement definitions.

Turn reading into a next step

Your action checklist

Work through these checks with your team or supplier. Tick the ones you have resolved and leave unknowns open.

Checks to discuss

Record what you know, what is still missing and the answer you need from your team or supplier.

Use project decisions only, without personal, patient or confidential details. Entries stay in this page and are not submitted to Kay & Co. Copy or download before leaving; this page does not save your notes.

Further reading

These sources provide background for the topic. The practice examples and checklist are illustrative planning suggestions from Kay & Co.

Related guides

Need help with this?

Tell us what is getting in the way. Kay & Co. can help you understand the options and turn the next step into something that works for your practice.

Explore marketing & search services or discuss your project.

Try the free Healthcare Digital Planner to find your starting priority.