Marketing & search · Practice guide

Compare marketing results fairly between locations

Illustrative situation

One location receives more enquiries because it offers additional services and longer opening hours. A raw league table makes another location appear ineffective. A larger site with more services naturally has more opportunities to attract enquiries. A raw ranking can hide stronger performance at a smaller location. Compare consistent definitions and explain capacity, exposure and service differences.

Healthcare marketing calendar, campaign materials and a laptop showing anonymous charts.
Help the right people find your service and take a useful next step.

What this means for your practice

Compare locations using relevant context and consistent definitions. Separate differences in exposure, service mix and capacity from potential marketing problems.

An example to discuss with your team

Create a sample comparison where a smaller location converts a greater share of relevant visitors. Check that the report does not rank it solely by total volume.

Healthcare marketing planning with an editorial calendar, audience question and campaign brief.
Start with the audience question and a clear content brief.
Healthcare marketing enquiry journey connecting a service page, message and appointment calendar.
Connect the public promise to a supported next step.

What to discuss with your agency

Ask the agency to show a sample where the smaller site converts a greater share of relevant visitors. Does the commentary recognise that? Keep incomplete outcomes visible. The report should help identify useful improvements rather than turn unequal locations into an oversimplified league table.

Put the brief into practice

Agree a common enquiry definition before comparing locations, then record material differences in their exposure, capacity and service mix. A site offering more services or longer availability may attract more contacts without its marketing being inherently better. Choose comparisons that support the decision you need to make, such as improving a page or understanding an enquiry-handling issue. Show the population or activity behind rates and keep incomplete outcomes visible. Ask the agency to explain a fictional case where a smaller site receives fewer enquiries but a higher share of relevant visitors take the intended step.

The commentary should recognise both volume and context rather than reduce the result to a rank. Review changes in local capacity or promotion alongside the figures. Where a like-for-like comparison is not available, say so and use the available evidence cautiously. The report should support useful questions for local teams, not create a misleading competition between services operating under different conditions.

How to check the result

Review defined outcomes against comparable traffic, capacity and service context.

Turn reading into a next step

Your action checklist

Work through these checks with your team or supplier. Tick the ones you have resolved and leave unknowns open.

Checks to discuss

Record what you know, what is still missing and the answer you need from your team or supplier.

Use project decisions only, without personal, patient or confidential details. Entries stay in this page and are not submitted to Kay & Co. Copy or download before leaving; this page does not save your notes.

Further reading

These sources provide background for the topic. The practice examples and checklist are illustrative planning suggestions from Kay & Co.

Related guides

Need help with this?

Tell us what is getting in the way. Kay & Co. can help you understand the options and turn the next step into something that works for your practice.

Explore marketing & search services or discuss your project.

Try the free Healthcare Digital Planner to find your starting priority.