Compare supplier proposals by observable outcomes
The proposal prices a website improvement as one package, making it difficult to know what acceptance evidence is included.
The Kay & Co. resource library
Keep your website working, know who to call when something goes wrong and make sure your practice can get back up and running.
Search a question, a task or a few words.
Search results
The complete list
Showing 25–48 of 111 resources, ordered by title.
The proposal prices a website improvement as one package, making it difficult to know what acceptance evidence is included.
The maintenance proposal covers website hosting, but important downloadable assets live in a separate account outside its scope.
The supplier sends invitations and closes the project, but the intended administrators have not accepted or tested them.
A system is technically restored, but users cannot complete the essential workflow because permissions and a dependent integration were not checked. A…
The hosting dashboard reports success, while the organisation's main domain still serves the previous release.
The alert reports an outage even though ordinary visitors can reach the site. The probe receives a security challenge.
A supplier reports a better synthetic performance score, but available field evidence still indicates a poor experience for part of the audience.
A page works when support checks it, so the incident is dismissed despite repeated failures under specific conditions.
A working application relies on undocumented settings changed during earlier incidents. Rebuilding from source alone would not reproduce its behaviour. A…
The website opens normally except for a section that continually redirects. Two routing layers may contradict each other.
A website supplier is leaving, but the handover request mentions only source code. Hosting configuration, design assets and maintenance instructions are…
Several suppliers join a fault investigation and each assumes another is coordinating it. Updates conflict and key decisions are not recorded. Several…
One supplier changes the domain while another controls redirects. Neither verifies the complete incoming journey.
A certificate renews automatically until a configuration change breaks renewal. No one notices because the site still works before the expiry date. A…
The monitoring tool warns about a certificate, but staff do not know whether the host renews it or someone must act.
The host and website developer each say a fault belongs to the other, leaving the practice to coordinate technical diagnosis.
The incident owner knows which deployment to restore, but the only authorised account holder cannot be reached.
Several software subscriptions renew automatically, but the budget holder and day-to-day owner are recorded only in old emails. Subscriptions can renew…
The supplier cannot reproduce a fault because the report omits the affected address, action and conditions.
A short-lived routing change remains after its campaign ends and masks the original destination. A temporary campaign rule needs an exit condition, not just…
A support inbox receives small edits without screenshots, URLs or approved wording. The maintainer spends more time clarifying requests than making them.…
One shared dependency fails and produces dozens of near-identical messages, overwhelming the practice's support channel.
Several similarly named repositories and hosting projects exist, and the handover does not state which one serves the public domain.
The previous website version returns, but an external configuration still points to the new incompatible behaviour.